This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are creditedĭata Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. Received: JAccepted: NovemPublished: December 19, 2014Ĭopyright: © 2014 Knauff, Nejasmic. PLoS ONE 9(12):Īcademic Editor: Cynthia Gibas, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, UNITED STATES Individuals, institutions, and journals should carefully consider the ramifications of this finding when choosing document preparation strategies, or requiring them of authors.Ĭitation: Knauff M, Nejasmic J (2014) An Efficiency Comparison of Document Preparation Systems Used in Academic Research and Development. We conclude that even experienced LaTeX users may suffer a loss in productivity when LaTeX is used, relative to other document preparation systems. LaTeX users, however, more often report enjoying using their respective software. On most measures, expert LaTeX users performed even worse than novice Word users. We show that LaTeX users were slower than Word users, wrote less text in the same amount of time, and produced more typesetting, orthographical, grammatical, and formatting errors. ![]() The probe texts included simple continuous text, text with tables and subheadings, and complex text with several mathematical equations. To assist the research community, we report a software usability study in which 40 researchers across different disciplines prepared scholarly texts with either Microsoft Word or LaTeX. The choice of an efficient document preparation system is an important decision for any academic researcher.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |